Vapers Digest 29th June
Monday’s News at a glance:
Electronic cigarette use after smoking cessation and lung cancer risk ~ Can nicotine protect the brain? Some researchers think it might ~ EU Recognises Swedish Success ~ Australia’s Vaping Reforms Are Already Being Declared a Success. The Science Says the Evidence Isn’t There Yet. ~ Queensland’s War on Illicit Tobacco and Vapes Has Become an Admission of Policy Failure ~ CAPHRA: Philippine anti-vape commentary asks the wrong public health question ~ How New Zealand Dramatically Cut Smoking Rates and What the World Can Learn From It ~ Sweden’s smoke-free success: Understanding gains of tobacco harm reduction ~ Sweden health minister attacks France pouch ban as ‘idiotic’ ~ Southern California’s total tobacco bans aren’t helping public health ~ Opinion: Philip Morris is trying to reduce cigarette smoking. FDA is slowing them down ~ 5th Circ. Backs FDA’s Block on Vape Marketing ~ PMI to Launch IQOS in Argentina by End-2026 After Regulatory Shift, Targeting About 7 Million Smokers ~ BLACK MARKET MAJORITY | 76% of Global Vaping Is Now Illicit
Electronic cigarette use after smoking cessation and lung cancer risk
Gal Cohen, Pubpeer
(Editor note: Comment on paper)
Commentary on Kim et al., Nature Medicine (2026)
Gal Cohen, Rose Research Center; Steve Cook, University of Michigan
This nationwide cohort study is notable as one of the first population-based analyses to examine lung cancer risk among former smokers who used e-cigarettes after quitting, in a country with high rates of cigarette smoking and rapid adoption of noncombustible tobacco and nicotine products. [1] Its large sample size, prospective design, and cancer ascertainment through a validated national registry are important strengths. Kim et al. report a pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.56 (95% CI 1.24–1.97) for former smokers who switched to e-cigarettes, compared with former smokers who quit without e-cigarette use. The corresponding estimate for continued smoking was 1.78 (95% CI 1.74–1.82).
However, a close reading suggests several issues that complicate the interpretation. The central concern is residual confounding by time since cigarette smoking cessation
Can nicotine protect the brain? Some researchers think it might
Lalain D. Aquino, Vital Record
For decades, nicotine has been cast as a harmful substance—infamous for its highly addictive properties that make people want to smoke despite its health risks. Its presence in almost every tobacco product has made smoking a notoriously hard habit to quit.
But scientists with the Texas A&M University Naresh K. Vashisht College of Medicine at Texas A&M Health are re-examining nicotine from an unexpected angle. They’re investigating whether nicotine and nicotine-like compounds may have protective neurological effects, potentially guarding the brain from diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease.
EU Recognises Swedish Success
Dave Cross, Planet Of The Vapes
The European Parliament has, for the first time, formally acknowledged that Sweden has reached the smoke-free target – accepted as having less than 5% of the population as smokers. In a post published on its X channel on Sunday (May 31), the Parliament stated: “According to recent national data, Sweden has become the first country to achieve the 5% EU target (for smoke-free status) in 2025.”
Two From Alan Gor
Australia’s Vaping Reforms Are Already Being Declared a Success. The Science Says the Evidence Isn’t There Yet.
A newly published paper in Tobacco Control has been presented as providing the “first results” of Australia’s sweeping vaping reforms, with the authors reporting that vaping prevalence in South Australia declined in 2024 after peaking in 2023 and suggesting that this may indicate the country’s increasingly restrictive regulatory approach is beginning to achieve its intended objectives.
At first glance, the findings appear encouraging for proponents of prohibition. However, a careful examination of the study design and the available evidence suggests that the conclusions being drawn are considerably stronger than the data can support.
Queensland’s War on Illicit Tobacco and Vapes Has Become an Admission of Policy Failure
The latest Queensland Health article, “Everything you need to know about illicit tobacco and vapes”, appears to have been written with a straightforward objective: to reassure the public that authorities are taking decisive action against illicit nicotine products and that Australia’s increasingly restrictive approach to tobacco and vaping regulation is being effectively enforced. Instead, it reads as something altogether different. Far from demonstrating a policy success story, the article inadvertently provides one of the clearest admissions yet of the scale of Australia’s illicit nicotine market and the unintended consequences of the country’s increasingly prohibitionist approach to nicotine regulation.
CAPHRA: Philippine anti-vape commentary asks the wrong public health question
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA)
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA) says a recent Philippine commentary on vaping and heated tobacco misframes the science by focusing on whether smoke-free nicotine products are harmless instead of whether they are safer than cigarettes for adults who would otherwise continue smoking.
CAPHRA said this distinction is central to sound public health policy. No credible tobacco harm reduction advocate claims that vaping or heated tobacco products are risk-free. The real question is whether non-combustible nicotine products reduce exposure to the toxicants most responsible for smoking-related disease.
How New Zealand Dramatically Cut Smoking Rates and What the World Can Learn From It
Quit Like Sweden
A new study in The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific documents one of the most striking public health reversals in recent memory — and the evidence points squarely at harm reduction.
For decades, New Zealand did everything right according to traditional tobacco control. It taxed tobacco heavily, banned smoking in public spaces, introduced plain packaging, and set one of the most ambitious smoke-free targets in the world. And for decades, smoking declined, slowly, stubbornly, nowhere near fast enough.
Then, almost without warning, the curve broke.
Sweden’s smoke-free success: Understanding gains of tobacco harm reduction
Godswill Iboma, Punch Nigeria Limited
In public health, progress is often measured not just by ambition, but by outcomes. Few countries today illustrate this more clearly than Sweden – a Nation that is quietly redefining what success in tobacco control can look like.
With adult smoking rates now at approximately 5.6 per cent, Sweden stands on the threshold of becoming Europe’s first smoke-free society. This is not simply a statistical milestone; it represents a profound shift in how nicotine consumption is understood and managed at a population level.
Sweden health minister attacks France pouch ban as ‘idiotic’
Tim Hong, Clearing The Air
Sweden’s health minister has attacked France’s ban on nicotine pouches as “idiotic”, escalating a row over Europe’s treatment of smoke-free nicotine products.
Elisabeth Lann, Sweden’s minister of health, criticised the French ban during an interview on the Swedish health and lifestyle podcast Hälsa för ohälsosamma.
The comments shift Sweden’s criticism of France’s policy from a trade dispute into a wider argument over public health and harm reduction.

Southern California’s total tobacco bans aren’t helping public health
Guy Bentley, Orange County Register
Let’s say a government agency pays for a study and is involved in the study’s design, data collection, analysis, writing, and interpretation. Would you find it plausible that the agency had zero influence on the study’s results?
Last year, the academic journal Tobacco Control published just such a study, investigating what happened when Beverly Hills and Manhattan Beach became the first U.S. cities to ban the sale of all tobacco products within their city limits.
Opinion: Philip Morris is trying to reduce cigarette smoking. FDA is slowing them down
Paul Pescatello, CT Insider
When Philip Morris International (PMI) moved its U.S. headquarters to Stamford three years ago, I was skeptical about its goal to use science and innovation to “end the sale of cigarettes.” The company aimed to develop less harmful nicotine alternatives to help adults stop smoking. In fact, PMI’s products have met with great success — millions of adult smokers have quit cigarettes as a result of PMI’s cigarette alternatives.
Since 2008, PMI U.S. has invested more than $14 billion to develop, research and commercialize smoke-free products — work that has involved more than 1,000 scientists, engineers and technicians.
5th Circ. Backs FDA’s Block on Vape Marketing
Tobacco Reporter
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s denial of marketing applications for menthol-flavored e-cigarette products submitted by two vape manufacturers, ruling that the agency reasonably concluded the products’ potential benefits for adult smokers did not outweigh the risks of youth initiation. The decision affirms the FDA’s application of the “appropriate for the protection of public health” standard required under the Premarket Tobacco Product Application (PMTA) pathway.
PMI to Launch IQOS in Argentina by End-2026 After Regulatory Shift, Targeting About 7 Million Smokers
2Firsts
According to Contexto Tucumán, citing iProfesional, Philip Morris International (PMI) has confirmed plans to bring its IQOS heated tobacco device to Argentina before the end of 2026. The plan was revived after the Argentine government removed long-standing restrictions and advanced regulation of such products. Contexto Tucumán reported that Argentina has about 7 million conventional cigarette consumers who previously had no legal access to the heated tobacco technology.
BLACK MARKET MAJORITY | 76% of Global Vaping Is Now Illicit
Global Forum on Nicotine
Over seven out of every ten vapes sold worldwide now come from the illicit market. Worth an astounding $47 billion USD annually, the global black market for vaping products accounts for 76% of all vapes sold, dwarfing the legal trade and proving restrictions largely ineffective. Shot on location at GFN 2026 in Warsaw, Poland, Shane MacGuill of Euromonitor International explains how taxes, restrictions, product bans, and regulatory barriers are driving consumers into illicit markets around the world.
A look back at how things have moved on or otherwise…
“This Lobby Is Impossible To Satisfy”
Dick Puddlecote
In 2007, a staff member at Puddlecote Inc who smokes commented on the inception of the smoking ban by saying “ASH may as well pack up now, they have everything they want”. I replied that they will never stop because if they did it would threaten the most precious thing to them … their salary.
Public health putting millions at risk
Satyajeet Marar
The current House of Representatives inquiry into the legalisation of personal vaporisers should be welcomed and not criticised, as tedious, tendentious public health fascist Simon Chapman whinged in the Sydney Morning Herald yet again last week. This inquiry is a response to an international consensus of independent public health bodies that vaping is not only a substantially safer alternative to smoking cigarettes, but that tobacco smokers should be advised to switch to vaping as an effective cessation strategy.
Visit Nicotine Science & Policy for more News from around the World








