Vapers Digest 15th April

 

 

Wednesday’s News at a glance:

Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Growing Credibility Crisis in EU Nicotine Regulation ~ Health Policy Without Accountability: The Rise of Global Health DoDOs ~ It’s High Time UK Life Insurance Companies Stopped Shafting Vape and Pouch Users ~ Swedish nicotine pouches reignite EU row over taxation and the free movement of goods ~ Open letter to Director General of DG Sante on behalf of Smoke Free Sweden ~ Sweden Is Now the World’s First “Smoke-Free” Country ~ The “Clean Nicotine” Thought Experiment ~ Operation Epic Fury, Brought To You By Nicotine ~ Dutch vape flavour ban backfires: New report shows rise in youth use, illicit trade, and smoking ~ High School Smoking Almost Gone, Vaping Way Down Too ~ People with Lived Experience(s) ~ Consumer Groups Across Europe Write to Commission: Stop the War on Harm Reduction ~ Advanced warning for smokers and vapers as huge price increase coming ~ ‘280% spike’ – Smokers smashed with huge tax increase ~ OPINION: The Commission just buried its own report on tobacco law. Why? ~ Orbán loses in Hungary. Could this spell the end for  Olivér Várhelyi as Health Commissioner? ~ Vivanco: Save lives — don’t tax nicotine products ~ Swedish Politicians Ask European Commission to Clarify Legality of France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban ~ WHY IS THE MEDIA IGNORING THE RECORD LOW IN YOUTH SMOKING?

Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Growing Credibility Crisis in EU Nicotine Regulation

Tobacco Harm Reduction

Across Europe, a fundamental tension is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. The debate over tobacco harm reduction (THR), once centred on the scientific evidence, is now shifting into something more consequential: whether policymakers are willing to act on that evidence.

Julian Morris, Roger Bate, Christopher Snowdon, International Center for Law & Economics

Executive Summary

Global health governance has shifted in ways that weaken democratic accountability while concentrating policy influence. The World Health Organization (the WHO), once a technical coordinating body, now operates within a broader ecosystem of Democratically Deficient Organizations (DoDOs)—intergovernmental institutions, philanthropic foundations, NGOs, and private actors that shape policy without meaningful public oversight. The move from assessed contributions to donor-driven, earmarked funding has severed the link between WHO priorities and member-state control. In its place, a small group of funders—most notably the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Bloomberg Philanthropies—now exert outsized influence over global health agendas.

NNA_Banner_Support_Trans

Visit Nicotine Science & Policy for more News from around the World

NSP-DG


innco-02

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Skip to toolbar