Vapers Digest 30th April
Wednesday’s News at a glance:
Operation Machinize ~ The Lords Debate ~ VApril Ends ~ Retailers Write to Government ~ Nicotine Patch for Long COVID or Alzheimer’s? Why Nicotine? ~ The Hypocrisy of VitalStrategies Harm Reduction Stance: Embracing Science in One Area, Denying It in Another ~ Sweden praised for its stand against European restrictions on safer alternatives to smoking ~ Healthcare Hub ~ Family Tragedy Spurs One Man’s Drive to Cut Smoking in South Africa ~ The fightback begins: Sweden seeks to block Spanish pouch ban ~ Spanish watchdog demands evidence to justify vape and nicotine pouch rules ~ Does Canadian Smoking Harm Reduction Depend on Pierre Poilievre? ~ Fear First, Facts Later: Griffith’s Blurred Minds Academy Pushes Panic Over Evidence ~ China’s E-Cigarrette Industry in Shenzhen Comes to a Standstill in Wake of Trump’s Tariffs ~ 20 years of WHO’s tobacco control draws criticism, not celebration ~ 20 Years Later, WHO’s Tobacco Control Framework Draws Criticism, Not Celebration ~ The WHO’s Failure to Protect Health: A TPA Webinar ~ The physics of vaporisation in e-cigarettes | GFN SCIENCE FAQ: PART 3
Four from Dave Cross, Planet of the Vapes
Operation Machinize
Barbershops and other cash-intensive businesses across England have been targeted by police and other law enforcement officers during a three-week crackdown on high street crime. In total, 265 premises were visited across Operation Machinize, where officers secured freezing orders over bank accounts totalling more than £1m, executed 84 warrants and made 35 arrests.
The Lords Debate
Baroness Merron presented the Tobacco and Vapes Bill to the House of Lords for consideration and debate last week. The government’s position remains that it should be allowed to grant itself 66 delegated powers to clamp down on vapes, eliquids and vaping under the guise of protecting children.
VApril Ends
VApril, the “largest and most successful vape awareness campaign in the world” has come to its conclusion, having placed public education at the top of the agenda. In its 8th year, organisers sought to combat “record-high misperceptions about the stop smoking tool”.
Retailers Write to Government
A group of small retailers and corner shop owners have written to the government about the Tobacco and Vapes Bill currently passing through Parliament. The business owners believe that measures contained within the Bill will add additional constraints, making it harder for them to survive at a time of economic difficulty.
Nicotine Patch for Long COVID or Alzheimer’s? Why Nicotine?
Joe Graedon, The People’s Pharmacy
For decades, researchers have considered nicotine a serious health problem. It is, after all, the addicting compound in cigarettes and other tobacco products. Humans have apparently been using tobacco as a drug for over 12,000 years (Nature Human Behavior, Feb. 2022). People have smoked, snuffed and chewed it. More recently, drug companies have created nicotine patches, nicotine lozenges, as well as nicotine gum. Nicotine is supposed to help people stop smoking. Such products are available without a prescription. Could this ancient drug also help people who are suffering from long COVID or Alzheimer disease?
The Hypocrisy of VitalStrategies Harm Reduction Stance: Embracing Science in One Area, Denying It in Another
Ziauddin Islam, LinkedIn
Vital Strategies recently posted on X, celebrating their presence at the Harm Reduction International Conference (#HR25Bogotá) and promoting health-centered solutions, including harm reduction, to address the overdose crisis. Their message is clear: “Harm reduction saves lives.” They even partnered with author Jessica Hoppe to share her personal story, emphasizing the power of evidence-based approaches (see their post here: https://lnkd.in/dbhyRQuC).
On the surface, this is commendable. Harm reduction is a proven, science-backed strategy that prioritizes saving lives over dogma. But here’s where the hypocrisy kicks in: while Vital Strategies and other Bloomberg Philanthropies grantees champion harm reduction for issues like opioid overdoses, they actively oppose *Tobacco Harm Reduction* (THR), dismissing the overwhelming scientific evidence that e-cigarettes and other reduced-risk nicotine products are far safer than combustible tobacco and help millions quit smoking.
Sweden praised for its stand against European restrictions on safer alternatives to smoking
Smoke Free Sweden
International health experts are applauding Sweden for opposing restrictions on safer alternatives to cigarettes in other EU member states and warn that blanket restrictions on nicotine products simply fuel the smoking epidemic.
The Swedish government has taken unprecedented action to challenge Spain’s proposed regulations on tobacco-free nicotine pouches, commonly known as “white snus”, which would severely limit consumer access to these reduced-risk products.
Healthcare Hub
UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA)
Vaping, which offers a critical lifeline for smokers as a powerful and evidence-backed quitting tool, has been instrumental in bringing the UK’s smoking prevalence down to record low levels and has an undeniable role to play in helping achieve smokefree ambitions. It also has the potential to reduce cost burdens to our struggling NHS.
Sadly, misperceptions about vaping are at an all-time high, with 50% of smokers wrongly believing it to be as or more harmful than smoking – which claims almost 78,000 lives every year in England alone.
Family Tragedy Spurs One Man’s Drive to Cut Smoking in South Africa
Kiran Sidhu, Filter
Kurt Yeo is the co-founder of Vaping Saved My Life (VSML), a South African consumer group, which among other things shares information about tobacco harm reduction and platforms testimonials from people whose lives THR has transformed.
Yeo is in that number. His father’s death to smoking-related illness—sadly, that would not be the last such tragedy in his life—spurred his own journey of switching from cigarettes to vapes.
Two from Clearing The Air
The fightback begins: Sweden seeks to block Spanish pouch ban
Alastair Cohen
The Swedish government has announced that it will mount a legal challenge to Spain’s proposed ban on nicotine pouches at the EU level.
Swedish Minister for Foreign Trade, Benjamin Dousa, announced that his government planned to submit what’s known as a Detailed Opinion, or DO, to the European Commission. This forces Spain to delay the implementation of its proposals for three months and respond to the Swedish government’s submission.
The Spanish proposal limits the amount of nicotine that can be contained in a pouch to a level far lower than the weakest varieties today, amounting to a de facto ban on the entire category. Spain also wants to ban all flavors except tobacco.
Spanish watchdog demands evidence to justify vape and nicotine pouch rules
Ali Anderson
The Spanish markets and competitions watchdog has asked the Ministry for Health for more scientific evidence to justify its heavy restrictions on vapes and nicotine pouches.
Spain is preparing a Royal Decree that will ban all flavours in vapes and nicotine pouches except for tobacco. There is also a proposed nicotine cap of 0.99 mg per pouch – far lower than limits in most other European Union countries.
The National Commission of Markets and Competition (CNMC) has now asked for greater evidence to support some of the measures included in the decree, which was sent to the regulator in November.
Does Canadian Smoking Harm Reduction Depend on Pierre Poilievre?
Joseph Hart, The Daily Pouch
It’s challenging to determine the extent of influence the pro-harm reduction community has on general elections. Claiming that he’ll “save vaping again” certainly did Donald Trump’s election chances no harm.
Similarly, I wonder if Rishi Sunak has had a sleepless night or two, worrying about how his support for the Tobacco and Vapes Bill further alienated the Conservatives from their supposed core values, such as personal liberty and free markets, thereby turning off 5.6 million potential voters.
Alan Gor, Australia, Let’s Improve Vaping Education (A.L.I.V.E.)
Another week, another moral panic. This time, Griffith University’s Blurred Minds Academy has turned its sights on nicotine pouches, claiming to “educate” young people while delivering an emotionally charged, one-sided narrative riddled with fear, ideology, and half-truths.
Let’s be clear: protecting young people from harm is a worthy goal. But distorting evidence and pushing alarmist messaging isn’t education, it’s propaganda. And that’s exactly what this latest campaign against nicotine pouches has become: a masterclass in scare tactics over science.
China’s E-Cigarrette Industry in Shenzhen Comes to a Standstill in Wake of Trump’s Tariffs
xinyue, AsianFin
Shenzhen’s e-cigarette industry, once thriving from robust exports, is now grappling with the fallout of rising U.S. tariffs.
The sharp increase in duties on e-cigarette products has led to a significant decline in shipments, particularly to the U.S. — one of the largest and most lucrative markets for Chinese producers. For Tina, a manager in the air freight sector, this shift has been dramatic.
Previously, overseeing regular flights carrying e-cigarette components from Shenzhen to Los Angeles was part of her routine. Now, those shipments have come to a halt as U.S. tariffs soar.
20 years of WHO’s Tobacco Control Draws criticism, not celebration
24 Share Updates
As the World Health Organization (WHO) marks the 20th anniversary of its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), a moment that might have been for celebration has instead become a focal point for sharp criticism from global health experts, consumer advocates and harm reduction proponents.
Rather than highlighting progress, a panel hosted by the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) used the occasion to reflect on what they called decades of stagnation, missed opportunities, and dangerous resistance to innovation in tobacco harm reduction.
20 Years Later, WHO’s Tobacco Control Framework Draws Criticism, Not Celebration
Martin Cullip, Taxpayers Protection Alliance
As the World Health Organization (WHO) marks the 20th anniversary of its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), what should have been a moment of celebration has instead become a focal point for sharp criticism from global health experts, consumer advocates, and harm reduction proponents. Rather than highlighting progress, a panel hosted by the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) used the occasion to reflect on what they called decades of stagnation, missed opportunities, and dangerous resistance to innovation in the field of tobacco harm reduction.
“The FCTC should have marked a turning point in global tobacco control,” said Clive Bates, former director of Action on Smoking and Health (UK). “Instead, the WHO remains entrenched in outdated, prohibition-style thinking. They actively oppose safer alternatives like vaping, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches—tools that are demonstrably helping people quit smoking.”
The WHO’s Failure to Protect Health: A TPA Webinar
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
In this webinar leading up to the World Health Organization’s COP11 conference, TPA’s Martin Cullip and David Williams sit down with subject-matter experts Roger Bate and Clive Bates to discuss how the WHO has not been living up to its ultimate mission of protecting public health.
The physics of vaporisation in e-cigarettes | GFN SCIENCE FAQ: PART 3
Global Forum on Nicotine
In the third episode of our science special, Roberto Sussman looks at the thermal processes that take place in vaporisation, and the impact different solvents have on the vaporisation temperature of e-liquids.
A look back at how things have moved on or otherwise…
Guess WHO?
Vaping, harm reduction & the World Health Organisation
James Dunworth, Ashtray Blog
The World Health Organisation can sound pretty negative on vaping at times. So it might surprise you that harm reduction (such as switching from smoking to vaping) is embedded in its tobacco control charter.
Nicotine illiteracy
Threatens pouches’ harm reduction potential – Snusforumet
Nicotine pouches have the potential to be a “credible, viable, and safer” alternative to deadly cigarettes, but nicotine illiteracy and a lack of research need to be addressed for the category to reach its full potential, a new report has found.
Visit Nicotine Science & Policy for more News from around the World