Vapers Digest 8th April

Wednesday’s News at a glance:
The Evidence Doesn’t Say That: On the New E-Cigarette Carcinogenicity Review ~ Does Vaping Cause Cancer? ~ Viewpoint Diversity Collides with Harm and Outrage ~ Application to Be a Compliant Nicotine User ~ Swedish MEP Praised ~ Media Amplifies Dubious Vaping Cancer Claims, CAPHRA Urges Scientific Integrity ~ EU tax plan could target vapes to fund cancer strategy ~ Vaping rises as smoking declines to record low, new CDC data shows ~ EU attacks vaping as ‘gateway to nicotine addictions’ ~ EU Tobacco Review Risks Driving Smoking and Illicit Trade, Warns Global Coalition ~ Brussel’s tobacco control evaluation is biased and ignores the evidence ~ Sensational new data shows Sweden ‘already smoke-free’ ~ Youth Tobacco Numbers Show a Public Health Win. So Why Is the FDA Silent? ~ Are Age-Gated Devices Really the Solution to the Youth Vaping “Epidemic”? ~ WHO and the FCTC and Why Should Canadians Care? ~ Vape makers turn to ‘Made in America’ credentials amid Trump’s tariffs, crackdown ~ FDA Allows Fontem to Continue Selling Pouches Amid Court Battle ~ Smart Glass Exposes Smokers in Shenzhen Malls Restrooms
The Evidence Doesn’t Say That: On the New E-Cigarette Carcinogenicity Review
Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Adebisi
A new review in Carcinogenesis concludes that nicotine e-cigarettes are “likely carcinogenic to humans.” That is a serious judgment. Read closely, the confidence sits uneasily with the weakness of the evidence on which it rests.
The review, led by Stewart and colleagues, draws on case reports, biomarker studies, rodent bioassays, and mechanistic evidence to conclude that nicotine-based e-cigarettes cause an “indeterminate burden” of oral and lung cancer. What it openly concedes, however, is that no epidemiological study has yet compared tumour incidence in e-cigarette users with nonusers. The paper builds its case from indirect evidence—and that matters for how far the conclusion can responsibly reach.
Does Vaping Cause Cancer?
Gideon M-K: Health Nerd
There are a few topics that health writers on the internet tend to stay away from, because of the nature of the debate. There’s nothing quite like writing what you see as a fairly innocuous piece about breastfeeding or ketogenic diets and getting bizarre hate mail the next day accusing you of what amounts to mass murder. Of these topics, vaping is arguably the most controversial.
I expect to get a fair few emails about this piece.
The reason for this is fairly understandable. The online debate around vaping has two broad sides—the public health argument, which tends to be that vaping is similar to smoking and should be discouraged, and a broadly libertarian viewpoint suggesting that vaping is the key to saving hundreds of millions of lives.
Viewpoint Diversity Collides with Harm and Outrage
#PickOnGitch
In 2024, the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco organized listening sessions for the board of directors to receive perspectives on participation (submitting abstracts to conferences and manuscripts to the journal) for those with connections to industry. As an example of the current state of the debate, see this recent commentary (Maddox et al, 2026).
Below are slightly updated remarks that I shared on 12 December 2024. And please note the Bibliography as it is full of gems and pearls (IMHO)!
Comments for SRNT Listening Session on 12 December 2024 updated as of 6 April 2026
Application to Be a Compliant Nicotine User
Alan Gor
There is a form now. You do not receive it directly. It is not handed to you with ceremony or explained in plain language. It exists more as an atmosphere than a document, a set of expectations, a posture you are meant to adopt, a quiet understanding that if you are going to use nicotine, you will do so on approved terms, in approved ways, for approved reasons. Still, for clarity, it helps to imagine it as a form. A real one. With boxes to tick. With statements to initial. With declarations that must be signed not just with your name, but with your compliance.
Section One. Purpose of Use.
Please explain why you use nicotine. Be careful here. There are correct answers and incorrect ones. Stress relief is acceptable, but only if framed as a problem to be solved. Habit is acceptable, but only if followed by an intention to quit.
Swedish MEP Praised
Dave Cross, Planet Of The Vapes
International health experts at Smoke Free Sweden have hailed MEP Jessica Polfjärd for warning Brussels officials not to undermine the Swedish harm-reduction strategy that has driven the country to the brink of smoke-free status. Polfjärd (EPP, Sweden) has submitted a formal written question to the European Commission asking how it will ensure that upcoming revisions to the EU Tobacco Products Directive do not remove the longstanding right of Swedes to access safer alternatives to cigarettes.
Media Amplifies Dubious Vaping Cancer Claims, CAPHRA Urges Scientific Integrity
Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA), Scoop
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA) says recent coverage of an Australian study on vaping and cancer risk gave the public a misleading impression by amplifying alarming claims without adequately reporting serious expert criticism or the much greater risks of smoking.
CAPHRA said the issue is not whether vaping is harmless. It is not. The issue is whether health reporting is presenting relative risk accurately and giving audiences the scientific context they need to make informed decisions.
Two From Clearing The Air
EU tax plan could target vapes to fund cancer strategy
Tim Hong
A new proposal in the European Parliament could see vapes taxed across the EU to help fund future cancer programmes.
According to a report by Romanian MEP Vlad Voiculescu, the bloc should raise €2 billion through new levies on nicotine products and ultra-processed foods to support its flagship cancer plan.
Push for new taxes
The proposal suggests setting aside a share of future EU tobacco taxes – currently under discussion as part of the Tobacco Excise Directive – alongside new taxes on highly processed foods.
Vaping rises as smoking declines to record low, new CDC data shows
Ali Anderson
Cigarette smoking in the United States has fallen to its lowest level on record, as vape use continues to rise, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The report found that 9.8 per cent of U.S. adults smoked cigarettes in 2024, down from 10.8 per cent in 2023 – marking the first time the figure has dropped below 10 per cent.
The long-term trend reflects decades of public health efforts and growing awareness of the harms of smoking. Rates have fallen sharply since the 1960s, when more than 40 per cent of American adults smoked.

EU attacks vaping as ‘gateway to nicotine addictions’
Carl Deconinck, Brussels Signal
Addiction experts are attacking the European Commission for a report on its tobacco control efforts which says novel nicotine products, such as vaping, are “pulling a new generation into addiction”.
Vaping and other new tobacco products “pose a particular threat to younger generations, who are at risk of nicotine addiction and long-term health consequences”, the Commission claims.
Part of the danger of vaping lies in “the attractive features and assertive online promotion of these products,” says the report.
EU Tobacco Review Risks Driving Smoking and Illicit Trade, Warns Global Coalition
Prohibition Does Not Work (PDNW)
Prohibition Does Not Work (PDNW), a global coalition of think tanks and consumer advocates, today criticized the European Union’s latest tobacco policy evaluation for ignoring growing evidence and reinforcing policies that have been proven to fail in practice.
“European policymakers are doubling down on measures that evidence shows do not achieve their stated goals,” said Tim Andrews, Director of Consumer Issues at Americans for Tax Reform and spokesperson for PDNW. “When safer alternatives are restricted, people do not stop using nicotine. They either return to smoking or shift to illicit markets. That outcome has been repeatedly demonstrated across multiple jurisdictions.”
The EU’s evaluation promotes further restrictions, including extending cigarette-style measures to reduced-risk products.
Brussel’s tobacco control evaluation is biased and ignores the evidence
Alberto Gómez Hernández, The Brussels Times
The European Commission published last week its evaluation of the EU’s tobacco control framework, a report that will shape the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) and influence nicotine policy for the next decade.
The report should have been an honest assessment of how effectively the TPD has reduced smoking and protected consumers, but it came out as a prohibitionist wishlist, drafted to justify tighter restrictions on safer nicotine products rather than to weigh the evidence with any real balance.
Sensational new data shows Sweden ‘already smoke-free’
Smoke Free Sweden
Sensational new research shows that Sweden is wiping out smoking even faster than previously thought.
Latest statistics from the Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN) reveal that daily smoking has fallen to just 3.7% – well below the global ‘smoke-free’ benchmark of 5%.
The findings also show that this historic reduction in smoking has been accompanied by a rise in the use of safer nicotine alternatives such as snus, nicotine pouches and vapes, which offer smokers a viable route away from cigarettes.
Youth Tobacco Numbers Show a Public Health Win. So Why Is the FDA Silent?
Guy Bentley, DC Journal
The Food and Drug Administration recently quietly posted a ZIP file on its website containing the 2025 National Youth Tobacco Survey, the federal government’s benchmark study for tracking tobacco use among kids.
Each year, senior FDA staff and officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention normally issue public statements about what the numbers mean and show. This year, there was silence.
I ran the numbers and found a wealth of good news about youth smoking. High school e- cigarette use now stands at 7.1 percent, down from 27.5 percent in 2019. Cigarette use among youth has collapsed to 1.8 percent. Use of nicotine pouches, which have become popular in many workplaces over the last two years, is just 2.2 percent. By any measure, these are great public health numbers.
Are Age-Gated Devices Really the Solution to the Youth Vaping “Epidemic”?
Joseph Hart, The Daily Pouch
Age-gated devices are increasingly being floated as a solution to the problem of youth vaping. But are they actually a good idea?
The youth vaping “problem” or “epidemic” is actually a solution to the once high rates of youth smoking. However, a clear failure to understand that dynamic has set various advocacy and public health groups off on a mad chase to restrict or outlaw vaping, in the mistaken belief that suddenly human beings will throw up our hands and stop liking nicotine.
WHO and the FCTC and Why Should Canadians Care?
The Nicotine Project
Most people have heard of the World Health Organization (WHO), but very few understand how much influence it actually has. Even fewer have heard of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). And yet, if you want to understand nicotine policy in Canada today, specifically why nicotine pouches are behind lock and key at a pharmacy, you need to understand both.
The WHO is a global public health body. It doesn’t make laws in Canada, but it does shape how governments think ( COVID, Environment, Tobacco) It sets narratives, issues recommendations, and influences how risks are framed.
Vape makers turn to ‘Made in America’ credentials amid Trump’s tariffs, crackdown
Emma Rumney, Reuters
The U.S. vaping market, long dominated by Chinese imports, is seeing an uptick of “Made in America” products, in what some analysts and industry executives say is a reaction to the Trump administration’s crackdown on unlicensed brands.
The products suggest the multi-billion-dollar industry is shifting marketing tactics under President Donald Trump’s global trade tariff salvoes and a tougher approach to unlicensed vapes from U.S. authorities, especially against popular Chinese labels.
Two From Tobacco Reporter
FDA Allows Fontem to Continue Selling Pouches Amid Court Battle
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration confirmed it will not block production or sales of Fontem US’s Zone nicotine pouches while a lawsuit over the product’s pending premarket tobacco product application proceeds, Law 360 reported. Fontem argued that the agency unlawfully delayed reviewing its application, leaving the product in regulatory limbo.
Smart Glass Exposes Smokers in Shenzhen Malls Restrooms
Two shopping centers in Shenzhen, China, have fitted men’s restroom cubicles with smart glass doors that turn transparent when smoke is detected, aiming to stop visitors from smoking inside toilets. The system was introduced in August 2025 at the Shuibei International Center and Gold Plaza. Sensors trigger the glass to clear if cigarette smoke is present, exposing the occupant and discouraging the behavior.
A look back at how things have moved on or otherwise…
CDC, FDA Want Millions Of Dollars
To Keep Fomenting Nicotine Misinformation Campaigns
Lindsey Stroud
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently unveiled their proposed fiscal year (FY) 2025 budgets. Unsurprisingly, both agencies are requesting additional funding, through congressional appropriations and/or fees upon consumers, to address tobacco use — namely among youth.
Turning Vapers into Criminals
In a bold stance against Australia’s stringent vaping regulations, the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA) today laid bare the reality of Australia’s appalling approach to regulating vaping – it will make vapers’ criminals. The group, led by Executive Coordinator Nancy Loucas, is urging for a more balanced and evidence-based approach to tobacco harm reduction.
Visit Nicotine Science & Policy for more News from around the World






